中国水稻科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 35-43.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5061
圣忠华1, 朱子亮2, 马宁1, 李威2, 贺记外1, 魏祥进1, 邵高能1, 王建龙2, 胡培松1, 唐绍清1,*()
收稿日期:
2015-04-08
修回日期:
2015-07-20
出版日期:
2016-01-10
发布日期:
2016-01-10
通讯作者:
唐绍清
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者;
基金资助:
Zhong-hua SHENG1, Zi-liang ZHU2, Ning MA1, Wei LI2, Ji-wai HE1, Xiang-jin WEI1, Gao-neng SHAO1, Jian-long WANG2, Pei-song HU1, Shao-qing TANG1,*()
Received:
2015-04-08
Revised:
2015-07-20
Online:
2016-01-10
Published:
2016-01-10
Contact:
Shao-qing TANG
About author:
# These authors contributed equally to this work;
摘要:
以中嘉早17/D50 F2和F2:3群体为材料,考查各群体株系产量相关农艺性状,同时构建其遗传连锁图谱,最后定位到与产量性状相关的66个QTL,其贡献率变幅为0.08% ~ 20.45%,分布于除第9染色体外的其他各染色体上。两个群体在第3、7、10染色体某区段同时定位到多个与产量性状相关的QTL, 这些QTL的加性效应来自中嘉早17。在定位到的66个QTL中,F2和F2:3群体均检测到,且贡献率较大的QTL qPH-10(株高)、qFLW-4(剑叶宽)、qTGW-2(千粒重) 加性效应均来自中嘉早17。初步检测到超级稻品种中嘉早17携带多个高产QTL,为今后将中嘉早17的优良基因导入其他水稻品种进而培育产量更高、综合性状更优良的超级稻新品种提供理论和技术支持。
中图分类号:
圣忠华, 朱子亮, 马宁, 李威, 贺记外, 魏祥进, 邵高能, 王建龙, 胡培松, 唐绍清. 超级稻品种中嘉早17产量相关性状QTL定位研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 35-43.
Zhong-hua SHENG, Zi-liang ZHU, Ning MA, Wei LI, Ji-wai HE, Xiang-jin WEI, Gao-neng SHAO, Jian-long WANG, Pei-song HU, Shao-qing TANG. QTL Mapping of Yield Related Traits in Super Rice Variety Zhongjiazao 17[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 35-43.
图1 中嘉早17/D50 F2与F2:3群体农艺性状表型频率分布 YK17-中嘉早17。
Fig. 1. Phenotypic frequency distributions of agronomic traits in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50. YK17, Zhongjiazao 17.
性状与世代 Trait and generation | F2 / F2:3分离群体 Segregation populations | 亲本 Parent | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
变幅 Variation | 峰值 Peak | 偏值 Partial | D50 | 中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17 | ||||
株高 PH/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 67.13~123.00 | 92.52±0.66 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 90.50 | 77.71 | ||
F2:3 | 71.76~130.70 | 101.92±0.71 | 0.37 | -0.26 | 91.20 | 79.30 | ||
剑叶长 LFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 20.14~53.89 | 34.04±0.34 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 31.40 | 30.80 | ||
F2:3 | 19.10~44.54 | 31.76±0.32 | -0.10 | 0.16 | 33.10 | 30.30 | ||
剑叶宽 WFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 1.06~2.23 | 1.65±0.01 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 1.31 | 1.79 | ||
F2:3 | 1.18~3.77 | 1.66±0.02 | 2.26 | 3.52 | 1.35 | 1.81 | ||
有效穗数 NTPP | ||||||||
F2 | 5.50~36.00 | 14.12±0.35 | 1.98 | 1.05 | 13.60 | 15.10 | ||
F2:3 | 4.38~12.00 | 7.62±0.10 | -0.13 | 0.52 | 12.80 | 15.60 | ||
穗长 PL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 18.56~33.25 | 25.54±0.17 | 0.52 | -0.17 | 26.86 | 20.74 | ||
F2:3 | 17.21~26.44 | 22.00±0.11 | 0.10 | -0.30 | 27.10 | 19.80 | ||
单株总粒数 NFGP | ||||||||
F2 | 897.00~4295.00 | 1654.35±33.24 | 5.28 | 1.69 | 2188.43 | 1586.63 | ||
F2:3 | 594.88~1747.88 | 1076.50±15.30 | -0.01 | 0.52 | 1785.30 | 1521.36 | ||
结实率 SSR | ||||||||
F2 | 0.09~0.88 | 0.57±0.01 | 1.24 | -0.56 | 62.29 | 71.30 | ||
F2:3 | 0.20~0.87 | 0.63±0.01 | 1.14 | -0.64 | 65.30 | 78.10 | ||
千粒重 TGW/g | ||||||||
F2 | 15.17~29.00 | 22.97±0.15 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 22.00 | 25.60 | ||
F2:3 | 18.25~33.25 | 27.09±0.17 | 0.23 | -0.17 | 22.50 | 26.20 |
表1 中嘉早17/D50 F2与F2:3群体及亲本的农艺性状表型
Table 1 Agronomic traits performances of F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50.
性状与世代 Trait and generation | F2 / F2:3分离群体 Segregation populations | 亲本 Parent | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
变幅 Variation | 峰值 Peak | 偏值 Partial | D50 | 中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17 | ||||
株高 PH/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 67.13~123.00 | 92.52±0.66 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 90.50 | 77.71 | ||
F2:3 | 71.76~130.70 | 101.92±0.71 | 0.37 | -0.26 | 91.20 | 79.30 | ||
剑叶长 LFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 20.14~53.89 | 34.04±0.34 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 31.40 | 30.80 | ||
F2:3 | 19.10~44.54 | 31.76±0.32 | -0.10 | 0.16 | 33.10 | 30.30 | ||
剑叶宽 WFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 1.06~2.23 | 1.65±0.01 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 1.31 | 1.79 | ||
F2:3 | 1.18~3.77 | 1.66±0.02 | 2.26 | 3.52 | 1.35 | 1.81 | ||
有效穗数 NTPP | ||||||||
F2 | 5.50~36.00 | 14.12±0.35 | 1.98 | 1.05 | 13.60 | 15.10 | ||
F2:3 | 4.38~12.00 | 7.62±0.10 | -0.13 | 0.52 | 12.80 | 15.60 | ||
穗长 PL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 18.56~33.25 | 25.54±0.17 | 0.52 | -0.17 | 26.86 | 20.74 | ||
F2:3 | 17.21~26.44 | 22.00±0.11 | 0.10 | -0.30 | 27.10 | 19.80 | ||
单株总粒数 NFGP | ||||||||
F2 | 897.00~4295.00 | 1654.35±33.24 | 5.28 | 1.69 | 2188.43 | 1586.63 | ||
F2:3 | 594.88~1747.88 | 1076.50±15.30 | -0.01 | 0.52 | 1785.30 | 1521.36 | ||
结实率 SSR | ||||||||
F2 | 0.09~0.88 | 0.57±0.01 | 1.24 | -0.56 | 62.29 | 71.30 | ||
F2:3 | 0.20~0.87 | 0.63±0.01 | 1.14 | -0.64 | 65.30 | 78.10 | ||
千粒重 TGW/g | ||||||||
F2 | 15.17~29.00 | 22.97±0.15 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 22.00 | 25.60 | ||
F2:3 | 18.25~33.25 | 27.09±0.17 | 0.23 | -0.17 | 22.50 | 26.20 |
性状Trait (F2) | 株高 PH | 剑叶长 LFL | 剑叶宽 WFL | 有效穗数 NTPP | 穗长 PL | 单株总粒数 NFGP | 结实率 SSR | 千粒重 TGW | 性状Trait (F2:3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高PH | 0.322** | 0.242** | 0.004 | 0.066 | -0.009 | -0.008 | 0.080 | 株高PH | |
剑叶长LFL | 0.323** | 0.211** | -0.009 | 0.049 | 0.003 | -0.035 | -0.038 | 剑叶长LFL | |
剑叶宽WFL | 0.407** | 0.271** | -0.066 | 0.070 | 0.023 | -0.119* | 0.036 | 剑叶宽WFL | |
有效穗数NTPP | -0.099 | -0.014 | -0.107 | -0.184** | 0.671** | -0.002 | 0.111 | 有效穗数NTPP | |
穗长PL | 0.268** | 0.153** | 0.087 | -0.158** | 0.205** | -0.151** | -0.073 | 穗长PL | |
单株总粒数NFGP | -0.010 | 0.003 | -0.152** | 0.312** | 0.123* | -0.119* | -0.013 | 单株总粒数NFGP | |
结实率SSR | 0.014 | 0.026 | -0.022 | -0.213** | 0.050 | -0.260** | 0.118* | 结实率SSR | |
千粒重TGW | 0.084 | -0.077 | 0.081 | -0.136* | -0.008 | -0.055 | -0.070 | 千粒重TGW |
表2 中嘉早17/D50 F2与F2:3群体不同性状间的相关系数
Table 2 Correlation coefficients among agronomic traits in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50.
性状Trait (F2) | 株高 PH | 剑叶长 LFL | 剑叶宽 WFL | 有效穗数 NTPP | 穗长 PL | 单株总粒数 NFGP | 结实率 SSR | 千粒重 TGW | 性状Trait (F2:3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高PH | 0.322** | 0.242** | 0.004 | 0.066 | -0.009 | -0.008 | 0.080 | 株高PH | |
剑叶长LFL | 0.323** | 0.211** | -0.009 | 0.049 | 0.003 | -0.035 | -0.038 | 剑叶长LFL | |
剑叶宽WFL | 0.407** | 0.271** | -0.066 | 0.070 | 0.023 | -0.119* | 0.036 | 剑叶宽WFL | |
有效穗数NTPP | -0.099 | -0.014 | -0.107 | -0.184** | 0.671** | -0.002 | 0.111 | 有效穗数NTPP | |
穗长PL | 0.268** | 0.153** | 0.087 | -0.158** | 0.205** | -0.151** | -0.073 | 穗长PL | |
单株总粒数NFGP | -0.010 | 0.003 | -0.152** | 0.312** | 0.123* | -0.119* | -0.013 | 单株总粒数NFGP | |
结实率SSR | 0.014 | 0.026 | -0.022 | -0.213** | 0.050 | -0.260** | 0.118* | 结实率SSR | |
千粒重TGW | 0.084 | -0.077 | 0.081 | -0.136* | -0.008 | -0.055 | -0.070 | 千粒重TGW |
性状 Trait | QTL | 染色体 Chromosome | 标记区间 Mapping interval | LOD值 LOD value | 加性效应 Additive effect | 贡献率 Contribute rate/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | ||||||
株高PH | qPH-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM3746 | 4.18 | 2.76 | -4.96 | -3.02 | 11.68 | 4.25 | ||
qPH-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 3.86 | -4.77 | 9.63 | ||||||
qPH-3-2 | 3 | RM1373-RM7389 | 12.22 | 6.97 | 5.62 | 4.33 | 14.62 | 7.87 | |||
qPH-4-1 | 4 | RM6659-RM16759 | 2.60 | -2.72 | 3.51 | ||||||
qPH-4-2 | 4 | RM16759-RM16852 | 2.59 | -2.54 | 3.07 | ||||||
qPH-5 | 5 | RM163-RM3170 | 2.75 | 3.25 | -2.37 | -1.97 | 2.73 | 1.76 | |||
qPH-6 | 6 | RM162-RM5463 | 3.44 | 6.23 | -3.70 | -5.65 | 7.39 | 15.34 | |||
qPH-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.79 | 2.67 | 2.85 | 2.41 | 4.28 | 2.97 | |||
qPH-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.86 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.91 | 9.46 | 11.37 | |||
qPH-12 | 12 | RM28607-RM1227 | 2.76 | -3.28 | 4.99 | ||||||
剑叶长LFL | qFLL-1 | 1 | RM3746-RM8071 | 4.59 | -2.36 | 12.08 | |||||
qFLL-2 | 2 | RM6-RM6307 | 4.77 | 6.63 | -1.87 | -2.26 | 6.63 | 11.01 | |||
qFLL-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 3.56 | 0.29 | 0.18 | ||||||
qFLL-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 3.59 | 1.50 | 4.93 | ||||||
qFLL-5-1 | 5 | RM163-RM3790 | 4.71 | -1.12 | 1.65 | ||||||
qFLL-5-2 | 5 | RM3790-RM5907 | 3.24 | 1.99 | 7.09 | ||||||
qFLL-7-1 | 7 | RM11-RM234 | 5.99 | 1.95 | 8.31 | ||||||
qFLL-7-2 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 3.25 | 2.61 | 1.76 | 1.06 | 6.27 | 2.26 | |||
qFLL-10 | 10 | RM1375-RM3451 | 2.52 | -1.53 | 5.03 | ||||||
qFLL-11 | 11 | RM286-RM332 | 2.52 | 1.24 | 3.40 | ||||||
qFLL-12-1 | 12 | RM3747-RM247 | 2.66 | 0.86 | 1.78 | ||||||
qFLL-12-2 | 12 | RM247-RM519 | 3.10 | 0.65 | 1.04 | ||||||
剑叶宽WFL | qFLW-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM1344 | 3.08 | -0.09 | 10.31 | |||||
qFLW-1-2 | 1 | RM1344-RM8071 | 4.30 | -0.10 | 14.10 | ||||||
qFLW-1-3 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.69 | -0.09 | 11.08 | ||||||
qFLW-3 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 2.50 | -0.07 | 5.90 | ||||||
qFLW-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 8.10 | 4.76 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 14.37 | 9.04 | |||
qFLW-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 5.85 | 0.20 | 20.45 | ||||||
qFLW-11 | 11 | RM202-RM26652 | 2.84 | 0.02 | 0.90 | ||||||
qFLW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.65 | 0.02 | 0.48 | ||||||
有效穗数NTPP | qETP-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM3746 | 3.64 | 0.56 | 5.44 | |||||
qETP-1-2 | 1 | RM3746-RM1344 | 4.38 | 0.85 | 9.72 | ||||||
qETP-1-3 | 1 | RM8071-RM493 | 2.81 | -0.10 | 0.16 | ||||||
qETP-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.15 | 2.37 | 9.41 | ||||||
qETP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 3.05 | 2.55 | 8.15 | ||||||
qETP-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 2.98 | -1.72 | 5.48 | ||||||
穗长PL | qPL-1-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM1329 | 4.89 | -0.51 | 4.45 | |||||
qPL-1-2 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 7.08 | ||||||
qPL-2 | 2 | RM6307-RM7337 | 6.51 | -1.50 | 17.60 | ||||||
qPL-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 2.97 | -0.77 | 9.32 | ||||||
qPL-3-2 | 3 | RM6929-RM6914 | 3.07 | -0.35 | 1.25 | ||||||
qPL-3-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 2.54 | 2.77 | 0.21 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 7.48 | |||
qPL-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM17303 | 4.62 | 0.60 | 2.88 | ||||||
qPL-6-1 | 6 | RM20069-RM20155 | 2.50 | -0.64 | 2.96 | ||||||
qPL-6-2 | 6 | RM20155-RM162 | 2.75 | -0.83 | 5.13 | ||||||
qPL-6-3 | 6 | RM3765-RM5463 | 2.81 | -0.62 | 6.73 | ||||||
qPL-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.45 | 0.53 | 2.32 | ||||||
qPL-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.09 | 0.83 | 5.66 | ||||||
单株总粒数NFGP | qNGP-3-1 | 3 | RM5480-RM7197 | 3.28 | -106.49 | 9.90 | |||||
qNGP-3-2 | 3 | RM15012-RM3601 | 3.66 | 91.77 | 7.67 | ||||||
qNGP-6 | 6 | RM3183-RM20069 | 3.10 | -96.60 | 8.69 | ||||||
qNGP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 2.71 | 238.25 | 7.97 | ||||||
qNGP-12 | 12 | RM1300-RM1227 | 2.53 | -59.34 | 3.31 | ||||||
结实率 SSR | qSSR-1 | 1 | RM8068-RM3746 | 3.98 | 0.04 | 7.01 | |||||
qSSR-3-1 | 3 | RM6914-RM15490 | 2.92 | -0.05 | 8.41 | ||||||
qSSR-3-2 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 3.17 | -0.05 | 7.92 | ||||||
qSSR-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM3839 | 3.01 | 0.02 | 1.65 | ||||||
qSSR-5 | 5 | RM6841-RM3170 | 4.97 | -0.06 | 12.42 | ||||||
qSSR-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.01 | -0.06 | 9.37 | ||||||
qSSR-8 | 8 | RM22529-RM23174 | 2.94 | -0.04 | 6.31 | ||||||
qSSR-11 | 11 | RM26062-RM26343 | 3.54 | -0.06 | 13.25 | ||||||
千粒重 TGW | qTGW-2 | 2 | RM12495-RM341 | 7.91 | 2.93 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 14.91 | 9.60 | ||
qTGW-3 | 3 | RM15012-RM15844 | 8.44 | 3.64 | 1.36 | 0.84 | 17.33 | 5.83 | |||
qTGW-6 | 6 | RM3805-RM20155 | 3.63 | 3.61 | 0.83 | 1.18 | 7.07 | 11.33 | |||
qTGW-10 | 10 | RM24952-RM2504 | 3.20 | 0.88 | 7.56 | ||||||
qTGW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.64 | -0.09 | 0.08 |
表3 中嘉早17/D50 F2与F2:3群体检测到的产量相关性状QTL分布情况
Table 3 QTL distributions of yield related traits detected in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50.
性状 Trait | QTL | 染色体 Chromosome | 标记区间 Mapping interval | LOD值 LOD value | 加性效应 Additive effect | 贡献率 Contribute rate/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | ||||||
株高PH | qPH-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM3746 | 4.18 | 2.76 | -4.96 | -3.02 | 11.68 | 4.25 | ||
qPH-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 3.86 | -4.77 | 9.63 | ||||||
qPH-3-2 | 3 | RM1373-RM7389 | 12.22 | 6.97 | 5.62 | 4.33 | 14.62 | 7.87 | |||
qPH-4-1 | 4 | RM6659-RM16759 | 2.60 | -2.72 | 3.51 | ||||||
qPH-4-2 | 4 | RM16759-RM16852 | 2.59 | -2.54 | 3.07 | ||||||
qPH-5 | 5 | RM163-RM3170 | 2.75 | 3.25 | -2.37 | -1.97 | 2.73 | 1.76 | |||
qPH-6 | 6 | RM162-RM5463 | 3.44 | 6.23 | -3.70 | -5.65 | 7.39 | 15.34 | |||
qPH-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.79 | 2.67 | 2.85 | 2.41 | 4.28 | 2.97 | |||
qPH-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.86 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.91 | 9.46 | 11.37 | |||
qPH-12 | 12 | RM28607-RM1227 | 2.76 | -3.28 | 4.99 | ||||||
剑叶长LFL | qFLL-1 | 1 | RM3746-RM8071 | 4.59 | -2.36 | 12.08 | |||||
qFLL-2 | 2 | RM6-RM6307 | 4.77 | 6.63 | -1.87 | -2.26 | 6.63 | 11.01 | |||
qFLL-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 3.56 | 0.29 | 0.18 | ||||||
qFLL-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 3.59 | 1.50 | 4.93 | ||||||
qFLL-5-1 | 5 | RM163-RM3790 | 4.71 | -1.12 | 1.65 | ||||||
qFLL-5-2 | 5 | RM3790-RM5907 | 3.24 | 1.99 | 7.09 | ||||||
qFLL-7-1 | 7 | RM11-RM234 | 5.99 | 1.95 | 8.31 | ||||||
qFLL-7-2 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 3.25 | 2.61 | 1.76 | 1.06 | 6.27 | 2.26 | |||
qFLL-10 | 10 | RM1375-RM3451 | 2.52 | -1.53 | 5.03 | ||||||
qFLL-11 | 11 | RM286-RM332 | 2.52 | 1.24 | 3.40 | ||||||
qFLL-12-1 | 12 | RM3747-RM247 | 2.66 | 0.86 | 1.78 | ||||||
qFLL-12-2 | 12 | RM247-RM519 | 3.10 | 0.65 | 1.04 | ||||||
剑叶宽WFL | qFLW-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM1344 | 3.08 | -0.09 | 10.31 | |||||
qFLW-1-2 | 1 | RM1344-RM8071 | 4.30 | -0.10 | 14.10 | ||||||
qFLW-1-3 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.69 | -0.09 | 11.08 | ||||||
qFLW-3 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 2.50 | -0.07 | 5.90 | ||||||
qFLW-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 8.10 | 4.76 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 14.37 | 9.04 | |||
qFLW-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 5.85 | 0.20 | 20.45 | ||||||
qFLW-11 | 11 | RM202-RM26652 | 2.84 | 0.02 | 0.90 | ||||||
qFLW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.65 | 0.02 | 0.48 | ||||||
有效穗数NTPP | qETP-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM3746 | 3.64 | 0.56 | 5.44 | |||||
qETP-1-2 | 1 | RM3746-RM1344 | 4.38 | 0.85 | 9.72 | ||||||
qETP-1-3 | 1 | RM8071-RM493 | 2.81 | -0.10 | 0.16 | ||||||
qETP-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.15 | 2.37 | 9.41 | ||||||
qETP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 3.05 | 2.55 | 8.15 | ||||||
qETP-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 2.98 | -1.72 | 5.48 | ||||||
穗长PL | qPL-1-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM1329 | 4.89 | -0.51 | 4.45 | |||||
qPL-1-2 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 7.08 | ||||||
qPL-2 | 2 | RM6307-RM7337 | 6.51 | -1.50 | 17.60 | ||||||
qPL-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 2.97 | -0.77 | 9.32 | ||||||
qPL-3-2 | 3 | RM6929-RM6914 | 3.07 | -0.35 | 1.25 | ||||||
qPL-3-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 2.54 | 2.77 | 0.21 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 7.48 | |||
qPL-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM17303 | 4.62 | 0.60 | 2.88 | ||||||
qPL-6-1 | 6 | RM20069-RM20155 | 2.50 | -0.64 | 2.96 | ||||||
qPL-6-2 | 6 | RM20155-RM162 | 2.75 | -0.83 | 5.13 | ||||||
qPL-6-3 | 6 | RM3765-RM5463 | 2.81 | -0.62 | 6.73 | ||||||
qPL-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.45 | 0.53 | 2.32 | ||||||
qPL-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.09 | 0.83 | 5.66 | ||||||
单株总粒数NFGP | qNGP-3-1 | 3 | RM5480-RM7197 | 3.28 | -106.49 | 9.90 | |||||
qNGP-3-2 | 3 | RM15012-RM3601 | 3.66 | 91.77 | 7.67 | ||||||
qNGP-6 | 6 | RM3183-RM20069 | 3.10 | -96.60 | 8.69 | ||||||
qNGP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 2.71 | 238.25 | 7.97 | ||||||
qNGP-12 | 12 | RM1300-RM1227 | 2.53 | -59.34 | 3.31 | ||||||
结实率 SSR | qSSR-1 | 1 | RM8068-RM3746 | 3.98 | 0.04 | 7.01 | |||||
qSSR-3-1 | 3 | RM6914-RM15490 | 2.92 | -0.05 | 8.41 | ||||||
qSSR-3-2 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 3.17 | -0.05 | 7.92 | ||||||
qSSR-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM3839 | 3.01 | 0.02 | 1.65 | ||||||
qSSR-5 | 5 | RM6841-RM3170 | 4.97 | -0.06 | 12.42 | ||||||
qSSR-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.01 | -0.06 | 9.37 | ||||||
qSSR-8 | 8 | RM22529-RM23174 | 2.94 | -0.04 | 6.31 | ||||||
qSSR-11 | 11 | RM26062-RM26343 | 3.54 | -0.06 | 13.25 | ||||||
千粒重 TGW | qTGW-2 | 2 | RM12495-RM341 | 7.91 | 2.93 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 14.91 | 9.60 | ||
qTGW-3 | 3 | RM15012-RM15844 | 8.44 | 3.64 | 1.36 | 0.84 | 17.33 | 5.83 | |||
qTGW-6 | 6 | RM3805-RM20155 | 3.63 | 3.61 | 0.83 | 1.18 | 7.07 | 11.33 | |||
qTGW-10 | 10 | RM24952-RM2504 | 3.20 | 0.88 | 7.56 | ||||||
qTGW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.64 | -0.09 | 0.08 |
图2 中嘉早17/D50 F2与F2:3群体均检测到的产量相关性状QTL及其所包含的已被精细定位和克隆的产量相关基因在染色体上的分布情况
Fig. 2. QTLs distribution of yield related traits on chromosomes detected both in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17× D50, and some fine mapped or cloned yield related genes in the mapped QTL intervals.
[1] | Normile D.Reinventing rice to feed the world.Science, 2008, 321: 330-333. |
[2] | 程式华. 中国超级稻育种. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. |
Cheng S H.The Super Rice Breeding of China. Beijing: Science press, 2010: 1. | |
[3] | 李绍波, 杨国华, 章志宏, 等. 水稻产量要素相关性状QTL定位. 武汉大学学报:理学版, 2008, 54(6): 713-718. |
Li S B, Yang G H, Zhang Z H, et al.Mapping of QTL controlling yield component related traits in rice.J Wuhan Univ, 2008, 54(6): 713-718. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 刁林林, 赵宏伟, 王敬国, 等. 水稻重要农艺性状的QTL定位. 东北农业大学学报, 2012, 43(1): 48-54. |
Diao L L, Zhao H W, Wang J G, et al.QTL analysis of important agronomic traits in rice.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2012, 43(1): 48-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 许凌, 张亚东, 朱镇, 等. 不同年份水稻产量性状的QTL分析. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(4): 370-376. |
Xu L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, et al.Dissection of QTLs in two years for yield component traits in rice (Oryza sativa).Chin J Rice Sci, 2008, 22(4): 370-376. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 占小登, 于萍, 林泽川, 等. 利用大粒籼/小粒粳重组自交系定位水稻生育期及产量相关性状QTL. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(6): 570-580. |
Zhan X D, Yu P, Lin Z C, et al.QTL Mapping of heading date and yield-related traits in rice using a recombination inbred lines (RILs) population derived from BG1/XLJ.Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(6): 570-580. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王兰, 李智, 郑杏梅, 等. 普通野生稻矮化突变体的株高与分蘖基因的QTL定位及主效基因的遗传分析. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(5): 5-9. |
Wang L, Li Z, Zheng X M, et al.Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with height and tillers of Oryza rufipogon Griff. dwarf mutant and genetic analysis of major quantitative locus.Acta Agric Boreali Sim, 2014, 29(5):5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 胡兰香, 等. 水稻产量相关数量性状基因研究进展. 江西农业学报, 2014, 26(12): 16-20. |
Chen M L, Xiong H J, Hu L X, et al.Research advances in genes of yield-related quantitative traits in rice.Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2014, 26(12):16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, et al.Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice.Nat Genet, 2008, 40(6): 761-767. |
[10] | Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Mao H L, et al.GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein.Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112(6): 1164-1171. |
[11] | Mao H L, Sun S Y, Yao J L, et al.Linking differential domain functions of the GS3 protein to natural variation of grain size in rice.Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107(45): 19579-19584. |
[12] | Song X J, Huang W, Shi M, et al.A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase.Nat Genet,2007, 39: 623-630. |
[13] | Orjuela J, Garavito A, Bouniol M, et al.A universal core genetic map for rice.Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 563-572. |
[14] | 罗炬, 邵高能, 魏祥进,等. 一个控制水稻株高QTL qPH3的遗传分析. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4):417-422. |
Luo J, Shao G N, Wei X J, et al.Genetic analysis of a QTL qPH3 for plant height in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26(4): 417-422. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | van Ooijen J W. Join Map 4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Wageningen, Netherlands: 2006. |
[16] | Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B.Windows QTL cartographer 2.5 department of statistics. Raleigh, USA: North Carolina State University, 2006. |
[17] | McCouch S R. Gene nomenclature system for rice.Rice, 2008, 1: 72-84. |
[18] | 赵建国, 蒋开锋, 杨莉, 等. 水稻产量相关性状QTL定位. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(4): 344-352. |
Zhao J G, Jiang K F, Yang L, et al.QTL mapping for yield related components in a RIL population of rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(4): 344-352. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Liu G F, Yang J, Zhu J.Mapping QTL for biomass yield and its components in rice (Oryza sativa L.).Act Gene Sini, 2006, 33(7): 607-616. |
[20] | Hironori I, Tomoko T, Tomoaki S, et al.A rice semi-dwarf gene, Tan-Ginbozu (D35), encodes the gibberellin biosynthesis enzyme, ent-kaurene oxidase.Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 54: 533-547. |
[21] | Hong Z, Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka, Shozo F, et al.The rice brassinosteroid-deficient dwarf 2 mutant, defective in the rice homolog of arabidopsis DIMINUTO/DWARF1, is rescued by the endogenously accumulated alternative bioactive brassinosteroid, dolichosterone.Plant Cell, 2005, 17, 2243-2254. |
[22] | Zhang G H, Li S Y, Wang L, et al.LSCHL4 from japonica cultivar, which is allelic to NAL1, increases yield of Indica super rice 93-11.Mol Plant, 2014, 7: 1350-1364. |
[23] | Li Y Y, Tao H J, Zhao X Q, et al.Molecular improvement of grain weight and yield in rice by using GW6 gene.Rice Sci, 2014, 21(3):127-132. |
[24] | 李孝琼, 韦宇高, 国庆, 等. 水稻遗传图谱构建及粒形相关性状的QTL定位. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(7): 1154-1159. |
Li X Q, Wei Y, Gao G Q, et al.Construction of genetic map and mapping quantitative trait loci for grain shape-related traits in rice.J Southern Agric, 2014, 45(7):1154-1159. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 张向阳, 张红宇, 徐培洲, 等. 重穗型水稻穗部性状及剑叶宽的QTL定位. 杂交水稻, 2014, 29(6): 56-61. |
Zhang X Y, Zhang H Y, Xu P Z, et al.QTL mapping of flag leaf width and panicle traits of heavy-panicle rice.Hybrid Rice, 2014, 29(6): 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 陈燕华, 黄大辉, 邱永福, 等. 水稻主要农艺性状的QTL 分析. 华南农业大学学报, 2014, 35(5): 42-51. |
Chen Y H, Huang D H, Qui Y F, et al.A QTL analysis of main agronomic characters in rice,Oryza sativa. J South China Agric Univ, 2014, 35(5):42-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Kazumitsu O, Horiuchi Y, Noriko I, et al.A QTL cluster for plant architecture and its ecological significance in Asian wild rice.Breeding Sci, 2007, 57(1): 7-16. |
[28] | Yang J, Hu C, Hu H, et al.QTL Network: Mapping and visualizing genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations.Bioinformatics,2008, 24: 721-723. |
[1] | 吴婷, 李霞, 黄得润, 黄凤林, 肖宇龙, 胡标林. 应用东乡野生稻回交重组自交系分析水稻耐低氮产量相关性状QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 499-511. |
[2] | 李威, 圣忠华, 朱子亮, 魏祥进, 石磊, 邬亚文, 唐绍清, 王建龙, 胡培松. 粳稻柱头外露率QTL定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 23-30. |
[3] | 杨雪芹, 陈婷婷, 赵霞, 张彩霞, 杨永杰, 符冠富, 陶龙兴. 赤霉素与多效唑协同影响超级稻甬优12产量形成的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 53-61. |
[4] | 龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 籼、粳超级稻茎秆抗倒支撑特征的差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3): 273-281. |
[5] | 任洁, 赵秀琴, 丁在松, 项超, 张晶, 王超, 张俊巍, 张强, 庞昀龙, 高用明, 石英尧. 利用选择导入系进行水稻耐低磷鉴定与QTL定位分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 1-13. |
[6] | 郭保卫, 朱大伟, 许轲, 张洪程, 周兴涛, 朱聪聪, 曹利强, 陈厚存, 陈京都, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 李明银. 有序摆抛栽对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 45-55. |
[7] | 付景1,2,王志琴1,袁莉民1,王学明1,杨建昌1,*. 施氮量对超级稻产量和一些生理性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4): 391-400. |
[8] | 龚金龙,邢志鹏,胡雅杰,张洪程*,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕,高辉. 江淮下游地区籼粳超级稻生育期与温光资源利用特征的差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(3): 267-276. |
[9] | 刘丹# ,王嘉宇# ,孙健,唐亮,陈温福*. 利用InDel和SSILP标记分析北方粳型超级稻的遗传组成[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(2): 148-154. |
[10] | 冯跃,翟荣荣,林泽川,曹立勇,魏兴华,程式华*. 不同供氮水平下水稻产量性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 577-584. |
[11] | 王丽丽1 ,闫晓君1 ,江瑜1 ,田云录3 ,邓艾兴2 ,张卫建1,2,*. 超级稻宁粳1号与常规粳稻CH4排放特征的比较分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(4): 413-418. |
[12] | 陈培峰1 ,董明辉1,2 ,*,顾俊荣1,惠锋3,乔中英1,杨代凤1 ,刘腾飞1. 麦秸还田与氮肥运筹对超级稻强弱势粒粒重与品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6): 715-722. |
[13] | 付景,徐云姬,陈露,袁莉民,王志琴,杨建昌*. 超级稻花后强、弱势粒淀粉合成相关酶活性和激素含量变化及其与籽粒灌浆的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(3): 302-310. |
[14] | 郭梁,张振华,庄杰云*. 水稻抽穗期QTL及其与产量性状遗传控制的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 235-245. |
[15] | 斯华敏, 刘文真, 付亚萍, 孙宗修, 胡国成*. 我国两系杂交水稻发展的现状和建议[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5): 544-552. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||